Piblikasyon syantifik

Ekspresyon "piblikasyon syantifik» la regwoupe plizyè kalite kominikasyon syantifik ak/oswa difizyon dijital ke chèchè syantifik yo fè nan travay yo bay kamarad yo ak yon odyans espesyalis.

Kategori

Piblikasyon syantifik yo ka distenge selon orijin yo (akademik, rechèch prive...) oswa selon mwayen oswa kalite piblikasyon:

jounal syantifik ki revize kanmarad yo ;
Pwosedi konferans syantifik ki revize kanmarad yo ;
travay kolektif ki rasanble atik revizyon oswa rechèch sou yon tèm bay, kowòdone pa youn oswa plis chèchè yo rele editè oswa direktè(pa dwe konfonn ak piblikatè a ki, kòm yon mezon piblikasyon, pibliye travay la);
monografi sou yon tèm rechèch.

"Kantitatif» kont «kalitatif»?

Sijè sa a se sijè ki fè deba renouvlab pandan ke kantite atik syantifik ak kantite atik ki "site» yo te ogmante fò pandan de syèk, e menm plis pou de deseni, sitou akòz aparans Entènèt la ak motè rechèch li yo. Sa a se yon pwoblèm ki ta ka vin pi grav pa devlopman nan big data ak open data.

Malgre aplikasyon pwosesis syantometri, bibliyometri ^[1] ak jesyon piblikasyon syantifik, otè ^[2] ^, ^[3] ^, ^[4] ^, ^[5] ^, ^[6] ^, ^[7] alèt sou egzistans twonpe, prejije oswa etid kalite pòv ki polye pwosesis rechèch la ^[8] ak diskredite syans ^[9] malgre pwosesis yo redresman entèn nan corpus la (atik adisyonèl, koreksyon oswa retraksyon nan atik respektivman enkonplè, inègza oswa enkonklizyon). Gen kèk tou avèti sou lefèt ke yon nouvo ideoloji nan evalyasyon (kalifye kòm « esklavaj volontè » pa Gori & al. an 2009 ^[10] ) ak yon "presyon pou pibliye» grandi ka ankouraje yon « espyonaj akademik » ^[11] ak kòm repons yon fèmen nan laboratwa, nan detriman nan pataje laj konesans.

Referans

↑ Weingart P (2005) Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences ?. Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131.
↑ Maddox J (1988) Why the pressure to publish ?. Nature, 333, 493 (résumé).
↑ Angell, M. (1986). Publish or perish : a proposal. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(2), 261-262 ([résumé https://web.archive.org/web/20160624233202/http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=700246]).
↑ De Rond M & Miller A.N (2005) Publish or perish bane or boon of academic life ? ; Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321-329.
↑ Darnill A (1996) Publish or perish. Accountancy, 118 (1,237), 97.
↑ Colquhoun D (2011) Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science. The Guardian, 5(09).
↑ Lehrer J. (2010) The truth wears off: is there something wrong with the scientific method ? The New Yorker (article en ligne).
↑ The pressure to publish pushes down quality Scientists must publish less, says Daniel Sarewitz, or good research will be swamped by the ever-increasing volume of poor work, 11 mai 2016 ; Nature 533,147 (en ligne 12 mai 2016) doi:10.1038/533147a.
↑ Wheeler A.G (1989). The pressure to publish promotes disreputable science..
↑ Gori, R., & Del Volgo, M. J. (2009). L'idéologie de l'évaluation: un nouveau dispositif de servitude volontaire? . Nouvelle revue de psychosociologie, (2), 11-26.
↑ Mensah L.L (1982) Academic espionage : Dysfunctional aspects of the publish or perish ethic. Journal of advanced nursing, 7(6), 577-580.

[1] Weingart P (2005) Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences ?. Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131.

[Maddox1988-2] Maddox J (1988) Why the pressure to publish ?. Nature, 333, 493 (résumé).

[Angel_1986-3] Angell, M. (1986). Publish or perish : a proposal. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(2), 261-262 ([résumé https://web.archive.org/web/20160624233202/http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=700246]).

[DeRond2005-4] De Rond M & Miller A.N (2005) Publish or perish bane or boon of academic life ? ; Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321-329.

[5] Darnill A (1996) Publish or perish. Accountancy, 118 (1,237), 97.

[6] Colquhoun D (2011) Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science. The Guardian, 5(09).

[7] Lehrer J. (2010) The truth wears off: is there something wrong with the scientific method ? The New Yorker (article en ligne).

[NatureSarewitz2016-8] The pressure to publish pushes down quality Scientists must publish less, says Daniel Sarewitz, or good research will be swamped by the ever-increasing volume of poor work, 11 mai 2016 ; Nature 533,147 (en ligne 12 mai 2016) doi:10.1038/533147a.

[9] Wheeler A.G (1989). The pressure to publish promotes disreputable science..

[10] Gori, R., & Del Volgo, M. J. (2009). L'idéologie de l'évaluation: un nouveau dispositif de servitude volontaire? . Nouvelle revue de psychosociologie, (2), 11-26.

[Mensah1982-11] Mensah L.L (1982) Academic espionage : Dysfunctional aspects of the publish or perish ethic. Journal of advanced nursing, 7(6), 577-580.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]